XALQARO XUSUSIY HUQUQ SUBYEKTLARI. DAVLAT VA XALQARO TASHKILOTLARNING XALQARO TASHKILOTLARNING XALQARO XUSUSIY HUQUQ SUBYEKTI SIFATIDAGI MAQOMI. RAQAMLI SUBYEKTLARNING MAQOMI VA SHAXSIY QONUNINI BELGILASH MUAMMOLARI
Keywords:
xalqaro xususiy huquq, huquq subyektlari, xalqaro tashkilotlar, raqamli subyektlar, shaxsiy qonun, sunʼiy intellekt, yurisdiksiya, blokcheynAbstract
Maqolada xalqaro xususiy huquq subyektlari, davlatlar va xalqaro tashkilotlarning huquqiy maqomi hamda raqamli subyektlarning shaxsiy qonunini belgilash muammolari tadqiq etilgan. Tadqiqotda sunʼiy intellekt, avtonomli algoritmlar va blokcheyn platformalarining huquqiy subyektlik maqomi hamda raqamli transnatsional munosabatlarda shaxsiy qonun qoʻllashning kollizion-huquqiy muammolari, raqamli texnologiyalarning huquqiy tartibga solinishi milliy qonunchilik va xalqaro hujjatlar asosida nazariy va amaliy nuqtai nazardan tahlil qilingan.
References
1.1. United Nations. “United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property”. 2004. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/4_1_2004.pdf.
1.2. European Union. “Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I bis)”. 2012. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32012R1215
1.3. European Union. “Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act)”. 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022R1925.
1.4. European Union. “Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community”. 2009. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12007L/TXT.
1.5. European Union. “Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (AI Act)”. 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689.
1.6. Unidroit principles on digital assets and private law. International institute for the unification of private law. 2023. https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/principles-on-digital-assets-and-private-law-linked-1.pdf.
II. Ilmiy adabiyotlar va maqolalar
2.1. “Digital assets and electronic trade documents in private international law”. Article. 2025. The Law Commission. https://lawcom.gov.uk/project/digital-assets-and-electronic-trade-documents-in-private-international-law.
2.2. Malcolm Shaw. “States in International law”. Britannica Editors. Article. 2025. https://www.britannica.com/topic/international-law/States-in-international-law.
2.3. A.Ergashev. “Digital Issues in Private International Law: a Comprehensive Analysis of Contemporary Challenges and Solutions”. Article. American Journal of Education and Evaluation Studies, Vol.2, No.1 (Jan, 2025) file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/189-200+Digital+Issues+in+Private+International+Law.pdf.
2.4. Anurag Bana and Ammar Osmanourtashi. “Blockchain and Private International Law: Implications for Crypto, Payment Systems, Digital Wallets and Jurisdictional Concerns”. Article. 2023. https://www.ibanet.org/bli-may-2023-blockchain-private-international-law.
2.5. David Fox va Sarah Green (tahrirchilar). “Cryptocurrencies in Public and Private Law”. Oxford University Press. 2019 (2024 onlayn yangilanishi). https://academic.oup.com/oxford-law-pro/book/57725.
III. Boshqa manbalar
3.1. United Nations. “Report on State Immunity in Private International Law”. Report. 2024. https://legal.un.org/ilc/reports/2024/.
3.2. U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). “FinCEN Announces $100 Million Enforcement Action Against Unregistered Futures Commission Merchant BitMEX for Willful Violations of the Bank Secrecy Act”. https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-announces-100-million-enforcement-action-againstunregistered-futures.
3.3. Singapore High Court. “Cheong Jun Yoong v Three Arrows Capital Ltd and others SGHC 21”. Sud qarori. 2024. https://www.elitigation.sg/gdviewer/SUPCT/gd/2024_SGHC_21.
3.4. Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 573 U.S. 134 (2014). Supreme Court of the United States. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-842_k5fl.pdf.
3.5. International Court of Justice. “Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations”. Advisory Opinion. 1949. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/4.
IV. Internet saytlari
4.1. Google Scholar. httрs://sсhоlаr.gооgle.соm.
4.2. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net.
