ADVOKATLIK FAOLIYATIGA OID XALQARO STANDARTLAR TIZIMI VA UNING O‘ZIGA XOS JIHATLARI
Keywords:
advokatlik faoliyati, xalqaro standartlar, advokatlar mustaqilligi, huquqiy yordam, BMT tamoyillari, CCBE, O‘zbekiston advokatlik tizimi, kasbiy etika, huquqiy davlatAbstract
ushbu maqolada advokatlik faoliyatini tartibga soluvchi xalqaro standartlar tizimi keng qamrovli ilmiy tahlil qilingan. Maqolada advokatlik instituti tarixi va uning zamonaviy xalqaro-huquqiy bazasi, xalqaro hujjatlar - jumladan, BMT tomonidan qabul qilingan «Advokatlarning roli to‘g‘risidagi asosiy tamoyillar» (1990), Advokatlar xatti-harakati yevropcha qoidalari (CCBE) va boshqa mintaqaviy standartlar — tahlil etilgan. Yetakchi xorijiy va mahalliy olimlarning advokatlik mustaqilligi, etikasi va faoliyatini tartibga solishga oid ilmiy qarashlari umumlashtirilgan. Maqola O‘zbekiston advokatlik tizimini xalqaro standartlarga muvofiqlashtirishga oid amaliy tavsiyalar bilan yakunlanadi.
References
I. Normativ-huquqiy hujjatlar:
1) African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. (1981). Adopted June 27, 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5. African Union. https://au.int/en/treaties/african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights
2) American Convention on Human Rights. (1969). Signed November 22, 1969, O.A.S.T.S. No. 36, 1144 U.N.T.S. 123.
3) Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe [CCBE]. (2006). Code of conduct for European lawyers (as amended in 2006). CCBE. https://www.ccbe.eu
4) International Bar Association [IBA]. (2011). IBA international principles on conduct for the legal profession. International Bar Association. https://www.ibanet.org
5) O‘bekiston Respublikasi Advokatlik faoliyati va advokatlar kafolatlari to‘g‘risidagi Qonun. (2020, 30-dekabr). O‘RQ-664-son. Qonunchilik maʼilumotlari milliy bazasi. https://lex.uz/docs/5220292
6) O‘bekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi. (2023). O‘bekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisi. https://lex.uz/docs/6445147
7) United Nations [UN]. (1985). Basic principles on the independence of the judiciary. Seventh UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders.
8) United Nations [UN]. (1990). Basic principles on the role of lawyers. Eighth UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba. UN Doc. A/CONF.144/28/Rev.1.
9) United Nations Human Rights Committee [UNHRC]. (2007). General Comment No. 32: Article 14 — right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial. CCPR/C/GC/32.
10) United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [UNODC]. (2012). UN principles and guidelines on access to legal aid in criminal justice systems. United Nations.
II. Ilmiy adabiyotlar va monografiyalar:
1) Abel, R. L. (1988). English lawyers between market and state: The politics of professionalism. Oxford University Press.
2) Abel, R. L., & Lewis, P. S. C. (Eds.). (1988). Lawyers in society: Vol. 1. The common law world. University of California Press.
3) Aker, M. (2021). Lawyers’ independence and democratic governance: An empirical analysis of 42 countries. Journal of International Law and Comparative Studies, 14(2), 55–89.
4) American Bar Association [ABA]. (2020). Model rules of professional conduct (2020 ed.). American Bar Association.
5) Faundez, J. (2010). Access to justice and the rule of law. IDS Bulletin, 41(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00109.x
6) Hamidov, A. (2022). O‘bekistondagi advokatlik islohotlari: xalqaro standartlar bilan muvofiqlik tahlili. Huquq va jamiyat, 3(1), 105–120.
7) Jorion, F. (1995). L’avocat, miroir de la société et de la justice: Étude comparative européenne. Bruylant.
8) Kunkel, W. (1973). An introduction to Roman legal and constitutional history (2nd ed., J. M. Kelly, Trans.). Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1966)
9) Lawyers for Lawyers. (2020). Report on threats to lawyers worldwide 2019–2020. Lawyers for Lawyers Foundation.
10) Luban, D. (1988). Lawyers and justice: An ethical study. Princeton University Press.
11) Toshmatova, N., & Xoliqov, B. (2020). O‘bekistondagi bepul huquqiy yordam tizimining xalqaro standartlarga muvofiqligi. Yuridik fanlar axborotnomasi, 2(4), 34–55.
12) Voloshin, Y. (2019). Advokatlik standarty v stranakh SNG: evolyutsiya i tendentsii. Pravovaya nauka i praktika, 12(3), 78–97.
III. Sud qarorlari:
1) Morice v. France, App. No. 29369/10, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber, 2015). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-153436
2) Steur v. Netherlands, App. No. 39657/98, European Court of Human Rights (2003). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61464
