RAQAMLI ASRDA TASVIRIY SAN’AT: MUALLIFLIK HUQUQI VA MUAMMOLARI
Keywords:
mualliflik huquqi, sun’iy intellekt, tasviriy san’at, raqamli asr, sui generis, inson-markazli yondashuv, intellektual mulk, generativ algoritmlar, huquqiy tartibga solishAbstract
Ushbu ilmiy maqolada raqamli transformatsiya sharoitida tasviriy san’at asarlarining huquqiy muhofazasi va generativ sun’iy intellekt (SI) tizimlari bilan bog‘liq muammolar tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda AQSh, Yevropa Ittifoqi, Buyuk Britaniya va Ukraina kabi davlatlarning SI mahsulotlariga nisbatan yurisdiksion yondashuvlari qiyosiy o‘rganilgan. Muallif amaldagi milliy qonunchilikdagi huquqiy bo‘shliqlarni ko‘rsatib o‘tgan holda, O‘zbekiston uchun inson muallifligi va texnologik innovatsiyalar muvozanatini ta’minlovchi “gibrid sui generis” modelini joriy etishni taklif qiladi. Shuningdek, SI asarlarini identifikatsiyalash va ularni markirovka qilish bo‘yicha ilmiy-amaliy tavsiyalar berilgan.
References
I. Normativ-huquqiy hujjatlar:
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Mualliflik huquqi va turdosh huquqlar to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni. 20.07.2006-yildagi O‘RQ-42-son.
2. Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" (2022). – Sui generis rights for AI-generated works.
3. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (United Kingdom). – Computer-generated works section.
4. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
II. Xalqaro tashkilotlar hisobotlari va rezolyutsiyalari:
1. European Parliament. Resolution of 20 October 2020 on intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (2020/2015(INI)).
2. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Citizens' Rights, Justice and Institutional Affairs. Generative AI and Copyright: Training, Creation, Regulation. Policy Department for Justice, Civil Liberties and Institutional Affairs, 2023.
3. Publications Office of the European Union. Trends and developments in artificial intelligence - Challenges to the intellectual property rights framework: Final report. – Luxembourg, 2020.
4. Karttunen S. Copyright of AI-generated works: Approaches in the EU and beyond. – European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), 2025.
5. European Commission. Apply AI Strategy: Encouraging human-centric AI use in cultural and creative sectors. – October 2025.
III. Sud amaliyoti va rasmiy tushuntirishlar:
1. US Copyright Office. Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence. – Federal Register, Vol. 88, 2023.
2. Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Case C-5/08, Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (Concept of "intellectual creation").
3. Beijing Internet Court. Li v. Liu (First AI-generated image copyright case in China). – 2023.
4. US District Court for the District of Columbia. Thaler v. Perlmutter (Case on “Human authorship” requirement). – 2023.
5. High Court of Italy. Decision on AI-assisted works and intellectual effort requirement. – October 2025.
IV. Ilmiy maqolalar va darsliklar:
1. 17. Guadamuz A. Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative Analysis of AI and Copyright Law. – Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2023.
2. Ginsburg J. C. People Not Machines: Authorship and User-Generated Content // Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts. – 2023.
V. Elektron resurslar:
1. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Strategy. (Elektron resurs): https://www.wipo.int (Murojaat sanasi: 2026-yil aprel).
2. European Parliamentary Think Tank. AI and Copyright Law developments. (Elektron resurs): https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (Murojaat sanasi: 2026-yil aprel).
