HUQUQIY SOHADA BIOMETRIK TEXNOLOGIYALAR: O‘ZBEKISTON MA’LUMOTLARNI HIMOYA QILISH QONUNCHILIGI VA YAPONIYA TAJRIBASI TAHLILI
Keywords:
biometrik ma’lumotlar, ma’lumotlarni himoya qilish, APPI, Shaxsiy ma’lumotlar to‘g‘risidagi qonun, maxfiylik.Abstract
biometrik texnologiyalar (barmoq izi, yuzni tanish, ko‘z to‘r pardasini skanerlash va boshqalar) O‘zbekistonda va butun dunyoda tez sur'atlar bilan kengayib bormoqda.Bbu esa maxfiylik va ma’lumotlarni himoya qilish bo‘yicha jiddiy savollarni keltirib chiqarmoqda. Ushbu maqola O‘zbekistonda biometrik ma’lumotlarni qayta ishlashni tartibga solishni “Shaxsga doir ma’lumotlar to‘g‘risida”gi O‘RQ-547-sonli Qonun (2019) doirasida ko‘rib chiqadi va Yaponiya «Shaxsiy ma’lumotlarni himoya qilish to‘g‘risida»gi qonuni (Act on the Protection of Personal Information, qisqartirilgan - APPI ) bilan boshqariladigan ancha shakllangan tizim bilan taqqoslaydi. Qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil va rasmiy manbalardan foydalangan holda, tadqiqot shuni ko‘rsatadiki, har ikki mamlakat ham biometrik ma’lumotlarni aniq rozilik va xatarlarni baholashni talab qiluvchi maxsus toifa sifatida qaraydi. Biroq, O‘zbekistonning tartibga solish tizimi umumiy xarakterdagi normalardan iboratligi uchun hali boshlang‘ich bosqichda. Yaponiya esa Shaxsiy ma’lumotlarni himoya qilish komissiyasi (Personal Protection Comission, qisqartmasi - PPC) tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan batafsil ko‘rsatmalarni taqdim etadi va sun'iy intellektga asoslangan biometrik xatarlarni bartaraf etish uchun 2025-yilgi o‘zgartirishlarga tayyorgarlik ko‘rmoqda. Muhokamada O‘zbekistonda ijro etish va aniqlikdagi bo‘shliqlar yoritiladi va shaxsiy taklif va tavsiyalar bilan yakunlanadi.
References
1. DLA Piper. (2025). Data Protection Laws of the World: Uzbekistan. DLA Piper. Manba: https://www.dlapiperdataprotection.com/.
2. Morgan, R., Kowalski, J., & Given, P. (2025). Face-off: the intersection between biometric technologies and data protection law. PDP 25 7 (7). LexisNexis.
3. Ng, R. (2006). NOTE: Catching Up To Our Biometric Future: Fourth Amendment Privacy Rights and Biometric Identification Technology. 28 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 425. LexisNexis.
4. Rustam, T. (2024). Biometric Identification in Uzbekistan’s Legal System. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(8), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.217.
5. Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC), Japan. (2024). Guidelines on the Protection of Personal Information. PPC Website. Manba: https://www.ppc.go.jp/en/.
6. Government of Japan. (2023). Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI, Amended). Ministry of Justice. Manba: https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/.
7. Chambers and Partners. (2025). Data Protection & Privacy 2025 - Japan. Manba: https://practiceguides.chambers.com/.
8. Clifford Chance. (2024). Amendments to the Act on the Protection of Personal Information of Japan Proposed for 2025. Manba: https://www.cliffordchance.com/.
9. Clarip. (n.d.). Japan’s Efforts to Enact New Data Privacy Regulations. Manba: https://www.clarip.com/.
10. EuroCloud. (n.d.). Predicting the Next Amendment of the Japanese Privacy Law. Manba: https://eurocloud.org/.
11. Cookie Script. (2025). Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI). Manba: https://cookie-script.com/.
12. Global Compliance News. (2024). Japan: Personal Data Protection Commission – Announces Interim Report of Triennial Review. Manba: https://www.globalcompliancenews.com/.
